Evolution vs Creation essays

Evolution vs Creation essays The Great Debate: Should Creation Be Taught in School? Evolution versus creation has been a debate lasting decades upon decades in the United States and around the world. The mock trial held during class, however, was not to prove one view as right and the other wrong. Rather, the focus of the trial, from the view of the prosecution, was simply to prove that creation should not be taught as a The prosecution and the defense were each allowed four witnesses. A fifth grade science teacher, a preacher, a world religions professor, and Dawkins were called to the stand by the prosecution. My part in the trial was that of the preacher. Our argument was simple; the preacher believed creation to be true, of course, but did not see how creation could be taught as a science. Instead, the view of creation should be a part of a religion or philosophy class. According to the scientific method, a true scientific hypothesis or theory about anything must be able to be proven false. "There is a very important characteristic of a scientific theory or hypothesis, which differentiates it from, for example, an act of faith: it must be 'falsifiable'. This means that there must be some experiment or possible discovery that could prove the theory untrue" (Wudka 2). If there is no way to disprove something, it can not be classified as a science. In addition, a true science must be reproducible. According to Behe, origin of life scientists have created life using the same conditions that would have existed on the early earth. It is impossible, however, to duplicate creation. In addition to the argument of testability, creation should not be taught as a science because it goes against the rulings of the federal government. In 1987, in a case known as Edwards versus Aguillard, the U.S. Supreme Court held unconstitutional Louisiana's 'Creationism Act.' The Cre...